Systemic IgG exposure and safety in patients with primary immunodeficiency: a randomized crossover study comparing a novel investigational wearable infusor versus the Crono pump.

Aim: A novel, Investigational Wearable Infusor (IWI) was evaluated in a randomized, controlled, crossover, open-label study to determine if its delivery of subcutaneous immunoglobulin (IgPro20) achieved a comparable area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) versus the Crono S-PID-50 infusion pump (CP). EudraCT: 2016-003798-16. Materials & methods: Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) were randomized to receive IgPro20 in Sequence 1 (CP/IWI) or 2 (IWI/CP). The primary end point was AUC for IgG during the final week of each 4-week period. Results: 23 patients were enrolled. Evaluation of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 (pre-infusion) to 7 days after infusion (AUC0-7 days) (IWI: 1806 h*g/l; CP: 1829 h*g/l) and geometric mean ratio indicated comparable AUCs for IgG for both devices. Conclusion: Similar IgG exposure, indicated by AUC values, can be achieved with IgPro20 using the IWI or CP in PID.

Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) are at a higher risk of developing serious infections than healthy individuals. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy reduces this risk, as it raises a patient's antibody levels to help fight off infections. IgG replacement therapy can be performed as an intravenous or subcutaneous (under the skin) infusion. The subcutaneous route is associated with improved quality of life for patients, as therapy can be carried out at home by the patient, allowing for more flexibility, convenience and autonomy. Wearable drug-delivery systems are devices that stick to the body and automatically deliver doses of a drug to the patient. In this study, we investigated whether a novel Investigational Wearable Infusor device could deliver the subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy, IgPro20, in patients with PID. We show that the new infusion device can deliver IgG replacement therapy and allows for similar levels of IgG to be achieved in patients as a comparator device. This wearable drug delivery device simplifies drug administration and could help address some of the challenges associated with self-injection such as complicated infusion preparation, needle phobia and concerns about pain. Trial Registration Number: 2016-003798-16 (EudraCT).

Safety and tolerability of IgPro10 in Japanese primary immunodeficiency patients: a registrational study.

Studies investigating the safety of IgPro10 (Privigen®, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA) in Japanese patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) are lacking. This study evaluated safety and tolerability of IgPro10 in Japanese patients with PID. In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, registrational study for Japan, IgPro10 was administered intravenously at pre-study doses of 138-556 mg/kg body weight per 3-/4-weekly dosing cycle for up to 4 months. Frequency and intensity of adverse events (AEs), their relationship to IgPro10 and AE rate per infusion (AERI) were evaluated. Of 11 enrolled patients, 10 completed the study. The median (range) total duration of exposure was 16.14 (4.1-16.3) weeks. Eight patients reported 19 AEs, none severe (based on maximum severity), giving an AERI of 0.442. One AE was deemed related to IgPro10 treatment. Three patients experienced temporally associated AEs. No serious AEs or deaths were reported. Nine patients (90%) who completed the study tolerated flow rates of ≥ 8 mg/kg/min; 5 tolerated 12 mg/kg/min (7.2 mL/kg/h), translating into a threefold decrease in mean infusion time. IgPro10 was well tolerated at a flow rate of up to 12 mg/kg/min. Safety and tolerability findings were consistent with previously reported studies in non-Japanese patients with PID.

Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous IgPro20 at High Infusion Parameters in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency: Findings from the Pump-Assisted Administration Cohorts of the HILO Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of subcutaneous IgPro20 (Hizentra®, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA) administered at high infusion parameters (> 25 mL and > 25 mL/h per injection site) in patients with primary immunodeficiency. METHODS: The Hizentra® Label Optimization (HILO) study was an open-label, parallel-arm, non-randomized study (NCT03033745) of IgPro20 using a forced upward titration design for infusion parameters. Patients experienced with pump-assisted IgPro20 infusions received weekly IgPro20 infusions at a stable dose in the Pump-Assisted Volume Cohort (N = 15; 25-50 mL per injection site) and in the Pump-Assisted Flow Rate Cohort (N = 18; 25-100 mL/h per injection site). Responder rates (percentage of patients who successfully completed ≥ 75% of planned infusions), safety outcomes, and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) trough levels were evaluated. RESULTS: Responder rates were 86.7% (13/15, 25 mL) and 73.3% (11/15, 40 and 50 mL) in the Volume Cohort, and 77.8% (14/18, 25 and 50 mL/h), 66.7% (12/18, 75 mL/h), and 61.1% (11/18, 100 mL/h) in the Flow Rate Cohort. Infusion compliance was ≥ 90% in all patients in the Volume Cohort and in 83.3% of patients in the Flow Rate Cohort. The number of injection sites (Volume Cohort) and the infusion duration (Flow Rate Cohort) decreased with increasing infusion parameters. The rate of treatment-emergent adverse events per infusion was low (0.138 [Volume Cohort] and 0.216 [Flow Rate Cohort]). Serum IgG levels remained stable during the study. CONCLUSION: Pump-assisted IgPro20 infusions are feasible at 50 mL and 100 mL/h per injection site in treatment-experienced patients, which may result in fewer injection sites and shorter infusion times. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03033745 ; registered January 27, 2017.

Safety and Tolerability of Manual Push Administration of Subcutaneous IgPro20 at High Infusion Rates in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency: Findings from the Manual Push Administration Cohort of the HILO Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of IgPro20 manual push (also known as rapid push) infusions at flow rates of 0.5-2.0 mL/min. METHODS: Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) with previous experience administering IgPro20 (Hizentra®, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA) were enrolled in the Hizentra® Label Optimization (HILO) study (NCT03033745) and assigned to Pump-assisted Volume Cohort, Pump-assisted Flow Rate Cohort, or Manual Push Flow Rate Cohort; this report describes the latter. Patients administered IgPro20 via manual push at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mL/min/site for 4 weeks each. Responder rates (percentage of patients who completed a predefined minimum number of infusions), safety outcomes, and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) trough levels were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated; 2 patients (12.5%) discontinued at the 1.0-mL/min level (unrelated to treatment). Responder rates were 100%, 100%, and 87.5% at 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-mL/min flow rates, respectively. Mean weekly infusion duration decreased from 103-108 to 23-28 min at the 0.5- and 2.0-mL/min flow rates, respectively. Rates of treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) per infusion were 0.023, 0.082, and 0.025 for the 0.5-, 1.0-, and 2.0-mL/min flow rates, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild local reactions and tolerability (infusions without severe local reactions/total infusions) was 100% across flow rate levels. Serum IgG levels (mean [SD]) were similar at study start (9.36 [2.53] g/L) and end (9.58 [2.12] g/L). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous IgPro20 manual push infusions at flow rates up to 2.0 mL/min were well tolerated and reduced infusion time in treatment-experienced patients with PID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03033745.

Pharmacometric Analysis of IgPro10 in Japanese and Non-Japanese Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency.

PURPOSE: Immunoglobulin (Ig) G replacement therapy, administered intravenously (IVIG) or subcutaneously (SCIG), is the standard treatment in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID). We aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of serum IgG following administration of IgPro10 every 3 or 4 weeks in Japanese patients with PID, and compare with PK in non-Japanese patients. A previously developed population PK (PPK) model was validated, and predicted parameters were compared with the results from the clinical study. METHODS: The previously developed PPK model, containing IgG concentration data from 5 non-Japanese studies, was supplemented with data from 3 Japanese studies of IgPro10 or IgPro20 to compare the IgG PK parameters between Japanese and non-Japanese patients. The model was externally validated by simulating IgG concentration-time profiles in Japanese patients to predict serum IgG PK characteristics and to compare them with observed Japanese PK data from Study IgPro10_3004. FINDINGS: The analysis included 4502 serum IgG concentration values (from 34 Japanese and 168 non-Japanese patients). PPK estimates from the current analysis demonstrated a clearance (CL) of 0.139 L/d, central volume (V2) of 4.01 L, inter-compartmental clearance (Q) of 0.30 L/d, and peripheral volume of 3.51 L. These results were consistent with those from the previously published PPK model, with similar bootstrap means and 95% CIs. Goodness-of-fit criteria indicated that the final PPK model was consistent with observed data, with no systemic bias in model prediction. Prediction-corrected visual predictive checks confirmed a good description of data on both SCIG and IVIG. PK parameters were equivalent between Japanese and non-Japanese patients. Body weight was determined to be a significant covariate on both CL and V2. Simulated and observed AUC and maximum and minimum serum IgG concentrations were similar, with 90% CIs overlapping between simulated and observed IgG concentrations in Japanese patients. IMPLICATIONS: PK parameter estimates of serum IgG were similar between Japanese and non-Japanese patients with PID. The PPK model, updated with Japanese data, was consistent with the previously published PPK model and could accurately predict both individual and population serum IgG concentration-time profiles following IgPro10 IV infusions every 3 or 4 weeks. EudraCT identifier: 2016-001631-12.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Weekly Versus Biweekly IgPro20 Dosing in Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency.

Flexible dosing of IgPro20 (Hizentra®, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania) maintains normal serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in patients with primary immunodeficiencies (PID). Until now, clinical trials testing the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of serum IgG of weekly and biweekly subcutaneous IgG therapy were not published. This is the first study assessing PK characteristics following weekly and biweekly IgPro20 in patients with PID. The PK study was conducted in 2 parts: weekly dosing (12 weeks) and biweekly dosing (up to 12 months). Serum IgG concentration-time data were analyzed using noncompartmental methods to generate PK parameters. Fifteen patients provided PK samples for both dosing regimens. For weekly and biweekly regimens, mean doses per infusion were 109 and 213 mg/kg, respectively, and median tmax was 2.0 and 3.02 days, respectively. The mean Ctrough values were similar in weekly and biweekly regimens (10.21 and 10.13 g/dL, respectively). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals of biweekly to weekly Cmax and Ctrough were 1.10 (1.06-1.13) and 0.98 (0.95-1.01), respectively. The GMR of dAUC was 1.07 (1.03-1.10). This PK analysis demonstrated similar systemic IgG exposure after weekly and biweekly IgPro20 dosing with an equivalent monthly dose in patients with PID.

Pharmacokinetic properties of Privigen® in Japanese patients with primary immunodeficiency.

This prospective, Phase 3, open-label, study (EudraCT: 2016-001631-12) evaluated pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of 3-/4-weekly Privigen® (IgPro10, CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA, USA) in Japanese patients with PID. PK parameters including serum trough immunoglobulin (IgG) level before next infusion during the wash-in/wash-out phase (Ctrough), area under the concentration-time curve from time point zero to the last time point with quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last), dose-adjusted AUC0-last (dAUC), lowest and highest observed IgG levels (Cmin, Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), and total clearance (CL) were analyzed for both regimens of Privigen® (dose: 138-554 mg/kg body weight). Ten patients were included in this analysis (3-/4-weekly: n = 2/n = 8). Ctrough levels achieved ranged 7.96-10.05 g/L. Cmax was observed approximately 1 h after the start of the infusion in both regimens. Mean (SD [not applicable for 3-weekly data]) PK parameters: Cmax, 16.60 and 14.20 (5.53) g/L; Cmin, 10.60 and 8.53 (3.89) g/L; AUC0-last, 5971 and 6591 (2633) g*h/L; dAUC, 0.41 and 0.46 (0.19) g*h/L/mg; CL, 2.53 and 2.53 (1.00) mL/h and median Tmax was 1.19 and 1.14 h, for 3-/4-weekly dosing regimens, respectively. Privigen® PK characteristics in Japanese patients were similar between dosing regimens and to previously-reported results in non-Japanese patients with PID.

Privigen® has similar pharmacokinetic properties in primary and secondary immune deficiency.

PURPOSE: Primary (PID) and secondary immune deficiencies (SID) represent diverse groups of diagnoses, yet both can be effectively treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) replacement therapy. Guidelines for the use of IVIG in SID vary due to the paucity of data. The objective was to analyze available IVIG Privigen® (IgPro10, CSL Behring, Bern, Switzerland) data on Efficiency Index (EI) and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in patients with PID and SID. METHODS: Three Privigen® studies (NCT00168025, NCT00322556, and the observational study IgPro10_5001) were used to identify patients with PID and SID meeting the qualifying criteria for the PK analysis. PK properties of IVIG were estimated using a population PK model based on a standard two-compartment PK model. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) EI was calculated as the gain in serum IgG level per unit external IgG dose. RESULTS: A similar IVIG dose-serum IgG concentration relationship was observed in patients with PID (N = 90) and SID (N = 91). IgG EI was inversely proportional to the endogenous IgG concentration and comparable in PID (slope = -1.079) and SID (slope = -2.12). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the disposition of Privigen® is similar during IgG replacement therapy in PID and SID. The results contribute to the understanding of IVIG treatment of SID and may support an evidence-based approach for the use of IVIG in SID in the future.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Hizentra® in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency in Japan, Europe, and the United States: a Review of 7 Phase 3 Trials.

Many patients with primary immunodeficiency (PID) require immunoglobulin G (IgG) replacement therapy, delivered as intravenous IgG (IVIG) or subcutaneous IgG (SCIG). We aim to identify trends in efficacy and safety that would not be evident in individual studies of small patient numbers. Seven open-label, Phase 3, prospective, multicenter studies of the efficacy and safety of Hizentra® (a SCIG), conducted in Japan, Europe, and the US were summarized. Overall, 125 unique patients received 15,013 weekly infusions during a total observation period of 250.9 patient-years. Mean weekly doses of Hizentra® were 83.22-221.3 mg/kg body weight; infusion rates per patient (total body rate) were 25.2-49.3 mL/h across studies. The rates of infections and serious bacterial infections were 3.10 and 0.03 events per patient/year, respectively. Annualized rates of days hospitalized due to infection, out of work/school, and prophylactic antibiotic use were 0.95, 5.14, and 36.78 per patient, respectively. For the equivalent monthly dose, weekly Hizentra® SCIG administration resulted in expectedly-increased serum IgG trough levels in patients switching from IVIG, and maintained levels in patients switching from previous SCIG. Adverse events (AEs) totaled 5039 (events/infusion 0.094-0.773), almost all of which were mild/moderate. Three thousand one hundred ninety-seven were considered treatment-related, the most common of which were injection site reactions (2919 events; 0.001-0.592 AEs per infusion). Systemic AEs were very uncommon. The results from these seven studies indicate that Hizentra® therapy was both efficacious and well tolerated during long-term treatment. This is particularly important in patients with PID, who may require lifelong IgG replacement therapy.

Quantitative Evidence of Wear-Off Effect at the End of the Intravenous IgG (IVIG) Dosing Cycle in Primary Immunodeficiency.

PURPOSE: Intravenous IgG (IVIG) treatment wear-off is commonly experienced by patients, who report increased susceptibility to infection, and decreased quality of life towards the end of their 3- or 4-week dosing cycle, when serum IgG levels approach their trough. We quantified IVIG wear-off in terms of treatment efficacy and patient well-being. METHODS: Data were collected from patients enrolled in three Phase III trials of Sandoglobulin NF Liquid or Privigen, treated every 3- or 4- weeks. Pooled analyses of raw patient data compared the rate of infection and other clinical outcomes during the course of the dosing cycle. Subjective symptoms of wear-off were quantified by comparing patient-reported overall well-being scores. RESULTS: The probability of a first infection in the final week of the IVIG cycle was 1.26 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.76-2.11; p = 0.3621) and 1.55 (95% CI: 1.04-2.32; p = 0.0314) times higher than in the first week, for patients on a 3-week cycle and 4-week dosing cycles, respectively. Wear-off, as manifested by a decrease in overall well-being, was experienced in 10% of all cycles and reported at least once by 61% of the patients on a 3-week cycle, and 43% of those on a 4-week cycle. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the existence of decreased efficacy (treatment wear-off) towards the end of a 3-4 week IVIG dosing cycle, and provide a quantifiable evaluation to a phenomenon typically reported anecdotally. For patients experiencing wear-off, increasing the IgG dose or shortening the dosing interval and/or a switch to SCIG may be beneficial.

Effect of time to treatment on response to C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate for hereditary angioedema attacks.

BACKGROUND: C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate is well established as effective therapy for hereditary angioedema (HAE). It is thought that treatment of an acute HAE attack with C1-INH as early as possible improves efficacy, but there are limited data from prospective studies supporting this recommendation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of time to treatment (<6 vs ≥6 hours after start of an attack) with 20 U/kg of C1-INH concentrate on efficacy. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of time to treatment after start of an attack was performed for 2 studies with C1-INH concentrate: International Multicenter Prospective Angioedema C1-INH Trial (IMPACT) 1 (randomized, placebo-controlled) and IMPACT 2 (open-label, uncontrolled extension). Because of differences in study design, the data sets were analyzed separately. IMPACT 1 data were analyzed using Cox regression with hazard ratios (HRs). For IMPACT 2 data, linear regression was applied to evaluate whether earlier treatment leads to faster recovery. Descriptive statistics for treatment response were calculated for both studies. RESULTS: In IMPACT 1, treatment with C1-INH within less than 6 hours after start of an attack resulted in considerably shorter times to onset of symptom relief (HR, 3.36) and complete resolution (HR, 4.30) vs placebo. The benefit of C1-INH compared with placebo was reduced when administered after 6 or more hours (HRs, 1.18 for times to onset of symptom relief and 1.61 for complete resolution). Analysis of IMPACT 2 data indicated slower complete resolution of symptoms with later start of treatment. CONCLUSION: Early treatment with C1-INH (<6 hours) provides a better treatment response than late treatment (≥6 hours), supporting the international recommendation to treat HAE attacks as early as possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00168103 and NCT00292981.

Treatment response after repeated administration of C1 esterase inhibitor for successive acute hereditary angioedema attacks.

Placebo-controlled studies established the efficacy of replacement therapy with C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate for treating single acute hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks, but only limited data from prospective studies are available on repeated treatment of successive HAE attacks. This study evaluates the association between repeated treatments with 20 U/kg of C1-INH concentrate (Berinert; CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany) for HAE attacks at any body location and treatment response. In a post hoc analysis of an open-label extension study (International Multicenter Prospective Angioedema C1-INH Trial [I.M.P.A.C.T.2]), the association between repeated treatment with C1-INH and times to onset of symptom relief and complete resolution of HAE symptoms was assessed in patients who were treated for at least 15 attacks by linear regression on the ordinal attack number. Eighteen patients received C1-INH concentrate for at least 15 HAE attacks over a mean duration of 34 months. Demographic and baseline characteristics of these patients were similar to those of all patients in the study. The distribution of body locations and the intensity of HAE attacks were similar for each of the first 15 attacks and subsequent attacks. The extent of previous use of C1-INH concentrate had no effect on the time to onset of symptom relief, the time to complete resolution of HAE symptoms, or the time between attacks treated with C1-INH concentrate; the median of individual linear regression coefficients was not statistically significantly different from 0. Treatment with 20 U/kg of C1-INH concentrate provided consistent treatment response in patients treated for multiple successive HAE attacks at any body location. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00292981).

Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous IgPro20 in patients with primary immunodeficiency.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immunoglobulin replacement is a standard therapy for patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Subcutaneous administration of immunoglobulin offers more constant IgG levels than intravenous administration and simplifies administration for some patients. Use of L-proline as an excipient contributes to the stability of highly concentrated IgG preparations. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 (Hizentra®), a new 20% subcutaneous IgG solution, and compare the area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) with that of a similar intravenous 10% IgG solution (IgPro10; Privigen®). At the request of the US FDA, an algorithm for determining IgG trough level ratios (TLRs) was developed in order to provide physicians with a practical tool for monitoring doses during steady-state IgPro20 therapy. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase III clinical trial conducted in the US. The study was performed in a primary-care setting. Eligible patients were males or females aged 6-75 years with a primary immunodeficiency (common variable immunodeficiency or X-linked agammaglobulinaemia) who had received regular treatment with IgPro10 for at least 3 months prior to entering this study and had achieved serum trough concentration (C(trough)) values ≥5 g/L. IgPro20 was administered subcutaneously once weekly at initial doses equivalent to 130% of patients' previous doses, based on the results obtained in a Vivaglobin® study and due to an FDA request. After run-in, each patient's dose was adjusted to achieve an AUC comparable to that achieved with IgPro10 administered intravenously. RESULTS: Eighteen patients completed the study. Mean IgPro20 : IgPro10 dose ratio (dose adjustment coefficient) was 1.53 (range 1.26-1.87). The resulting mean AUCs were 105.6 g · day/L for IgPro20 versus 103.2 g · day/L for IgPro10 (geometric mean ratio 1.002; lower one-sided 95% confidence limit [CL] 0.951). Thus, the primary endpoint of the study was met, as this result exceeded the pre-specified criterion of the lower one-sided 95% CL of ≥0.8 for non-inferiority. At these AUCs, which were considered equivalent, the mean IgPro20 : IgPro10 TLR, determined by the developed algorithm, was 1.29 (range 1.18-1.73). Titres of specific antibodies tested were well above respective product specifications, suggesting that protection against infection would be effective. CONCLUSION: Steady-state AUCs with subcutaneous IgPro20 and intravenous IgPro10 were equivalent. Mean dose adjustment coefficient and mean TLR can be used for initial dose conversion without risk of under-protection but vary too widely to be considered measures of equivalence. Trial registration number (clinicaltrials.gov): NCT00419341.

Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, IgPro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency.

Subcutaneous human IgG (SCIG) therapy in primary immunodeficiency (PID) offers sustained IgG levels throughout the dosing cycle and fewer adverse events (AEs) compared to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). A phase I study showed good local tolerability of IgPro20, a new 20% liquid SCIG stabilized with L-proline. A prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase III study evaluated the efficacy and safety of IgPro20 in patients with PID over 15 months. Forty-nine patients (5-72 years) previously treated with IVIG received weekly subcutaneous infusions of IgPro20. The mean serum IgG level was 12.5 g/L. No serious bacterial infections were reported. There were 96 nonserious infections (rate 2.76/patient per year). The rate of days missed from work/school was 2.06/patient per year, and the rate of hospitalization was 0.2/patient per year. Ninety-nine percent of AEs were mild or moderate. No serious, IgPro20-related AEs were reported. IgPro20 effectively protected patients with PID against infections and maintained serum IgG levels without causing unexpected AEs.

Tolerability of a new 10% liquid immunoglobulin for intravenous use, Privigen, at different infusion rates.

PURPOSE: The tolerability of L-proline-stabilized Privigen, a new 10% liquid immunoglobulin for intravenous administration, was assessed at high infusion rates in a Phase III, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study in 45 patients with primary immune deficiencies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Maximum infusion rates were not assigned prospectively. For analysis, patients were grouped according to maximum infusion rate in a low infusion rate group (8 mg/kg/min) and high infusion rate group (12 mg/kg/min). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients, selected at the investigators' discretion for the high infusion rate group based on their good tolerability, tolerated Privigen at 12 mg/kg/min with no increase in temporally associated adverse events (AEs) above the level they had experienced at 8 mg/kg/min. The proportion of infusions with temporally associated AEs in these patients was 0.079 [97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.114] compared to 0.211 (97.5% CI 0.267) in the low infusion rate group. The most frequent AE was headache. Thus, selected patients tolerate Privigen at high infusion rates.

Factors motivating dyspepsia patients to enter clinical research.

One of the most influential factors in science and medicine has been the development of placebo-controlled clinical trials. However, recruitment of patients for clinical trials is sometimes a major problem in clinical research. Successful patient recruitment may be enhanced with a clear understanding of the motivating factors that determine a patient's decision to enter a study. We have developed the Patients' Expectations, Attitudes and Knowledge (PEAK) Program consisting of questionnaires designed to study the factors motivating patients to enter a clinical trial, as well as capturing the experiences of research participants. A total of 247 female patients with dyspepsia (mean age: 43.9; range: 18.0-78.0 years) who entered either of two prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trials in the USA completed PEAK Entry questionnaires during the first study visit. Based on their responses, the top three factors motivating patients to join the clinical trial were: interest in receiving investigational treatment with average score (AS) of 4.33 +/- 0.08 (M +/- SEM) on a 5-point scale, possibility of getting skilled professional care (AS = 4.07 +/- 0.09), and altruism expressed as an intention to help develop a new drug for the sake of other people (AS = 3.89 +/- 0.09). Age, ethnicity, and educational status significantly affected motivational factors of patients. These results indicate that recruitment can be enhanced by targeting these motivations in physician/patient communications, informed consent process and advertising for study participants.

Recruitment index as a measure of patient recruitment activity in clinical trials.

Recruitment of patients for clinical trials is one of the major hurdles on the way to successful completion of any human research study. Direct comparison of recruitment activity in different sites and projects is not easy due to lack of a unified measure of recruitment efficacy. The author introduces a new variable, the Recruitment Index, which represents the number of days required for an average study site in a multicenter study to recruit one analyzable patient. Once established in previous studies, an indication-specific Recruitment Index can be used for a variety of purposes, e.g. evaluation of efficacy of various recruitment strategies, planning duration of recruitment period for a new study, or projecting the number of participating sites required to supply a given number of analyzable patients within a certain period.

Omeprazole-induced slowing of gastrointestinal transit in mice can be countered with tegaserod.

Omeprazole, besides suppressing gastric acid, causes delayed gastric emptying, which may be associated with aggravated dyspeptic symptoms. Effects of omeprazole on small intestinal transit are unknown. In this study, we evaluated in mice if (a) omeprazole affects transit of a meal through the stomach and small intestine and (b) co-treatment with the promotility agent, tegaserod, can prevent the slowing effect of omeprazole. Omeprazole (40-150 mg/kg, i.p. once daily for 5 days) delayed gastric emptying of the meal in a dose-related manner. Small intestinal transit was then evaluated at the lowest dose of omeprazole (40 mg/kg) that did not retard gastric emptying. Such transit was significantly delayed after this dose of omeprazole compared with vehicle-treated controls. When tegaserod (0.10 mg/kg) was administered concomitantly with the omeprazole, small intestinal transit of the meal was not slowed and was not different from controls. These results show that omeprazole reduces aboral transit of luminal contents through the stomach and small bowel of mice and that this delay is reversed by tegaserod.